sallyhanan’s blog

A writer’s blog

Writing air quotes September 11, 2009

Bookmark and Share


Quotation marks are used for speaking most of the time, but they are also used for the classic air quotes, an annoying habit if ever there was one. They are the poor man’s visual for quotation marks.

The problem when writing air quotes is this: Where do you put the period? The other problem is: Why the overkill?

Perhaps we are becoming wittier with our freedom of speech, perhaps we are just becoming more stupid, but no matter, quotation marks are used to separate “special” words from the rest of the flock. We can use them to be ironic, sarcastic, shocking, different, metaphoric, funny, and other things we come up with to get attention.


For example
I’m “thirsty,” said the vampire. (implying he wants blood)
You’re so “pretty.” (as in, a certain generic prettiness of the area)
I see you got some “sleep” last night. (implying you were up all night with your new boyfriend doing the business)

The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS), 15th edition calls them scare quotes in section 7.58. “Quotation marks are often used to alert readers that a term is used in a nonstandard, ironic, or other special sense . . . They imply ‘This is not my term,’ or ‘This is not how the term is usually applied.’ Like any such device, scare quotes lose their force and irritate readers if overused.”

In section 7.59 it says: “A word or phrase preceeded by so-called should not be enclosed in quotation marks. The expression itself indicates irony or doubt.”

And in 7.60 “Phrases [that are] recognizable to the reader are often enclosed in quotation marks, with no source given [although more common expressions don't usually require quotation marks].”


Here in the US, the quotation marks go in the same place they always go—after the comma or period.

And now, words of wisdom to the “wise.” Quit reading my drivel. Go get your “bad” self off the computer and do some writing. Your book “needs” you.

 

 

Every piece of writing needs to be clear and precise. With microscope in hand, Inksnatcher’s writing and editing service will hone any work until it glitters in the light of a 1,000 watt bulb.

sallylogo3 INKSNATCHER.COM                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

 

Titles—use italics, quotation marks or roman? August 29, 2009

Filed under: Editing,Writing — sallyhanan @ 11:43 pm
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Most people get confused when they have to write the names of works. We all know about capital letters, but are the titles written in italics or left alone or set inside quotation marks?

The Chicago Manual of Style says the following about how to write these into pieces of writing:

Holy books are not italicized, i.e.
The Bible
The Verdas

Books, journals, plays, newspapers (and sections of a newspaper that are published separately) are italicized. Even if the is part of the official title, it must be lowercased unless it begins a sentence or is an official foreign language title.
She loved catching up on news with the Daily Mail.
El Confidencial had a good article in it today.

When the newspaper or periodical has a name that is the name of a building or organization or prize, it is not italicized.
The Tribune Tower unveiled a new column last week.

An italicized title within a title stays italicized but is set in quotation marks.
Insights on Golding’s “Lord of the Flies”

Titles of book series are not italicized.
the Harry Potter series

Parts of long poems or scenes of plays are given no special treatment.
act 2, scene 1


Movies, radio and television programs are italicized.

Ever After is my favorite movie.

Single episodes are set inside quotation marks.
“The Pilot, Part 1” of Seinfeld imitated the show.

Formal names of TV and cable channels are left alone.
the Barker channel

Stories, short essays, poems, articles; and parts, chapters, sections of longer works are enclosed in quotation marks.

Sally Hanan’s story “I Have a Gift” is in her book Joy in a Box (forthcoming).

If single books are put into a collection as one volume, the volume is italicized when quoted.
Toronto is a collection of most of the stories that Ernest Hemingway wrote as a stringer . . . between 1920 and 1924.

Unpublished works like lectures, theses, speeches, manuscripts are put inside quotation marks.

Titles of books about to be published are italicized, with the word forthcoming in parentheses after them.
Tibetan Weddings in Ne’u na Village (forthcoming)

Web site titles are left alone.


Musical works, artworks, and cartoon strips are italicized

Titles of songs are set inside quotation marks. Performers’ names are left alone.
Wide Awake’s song “Maybe Tonight, Maybe Tomorrow” is on their album Something That We Can’t Let Go.

Titles of paintings, drawings, and statues are italicized but the really old ones (whose creators are mostly unknown) are enclosed in quotation marks.

Garfield was created by Jim Davis.

     
So, to summarize, the big titles are usually going to be in italics. The smaller and not-so-important ones will usually be in quotation marks.

 

 

Every piece of writing needs to be clear and precise. With microscope in hand, Inksnatcher’s writing and editing service will hone any work until it glitters in the light of a 1,000 watt bulb.

sallylogo3 INKSNATCHER.COM                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

 

The Chicago Manual of Style July 3, 2009

Bookmark and Share

What is The Chicago Manual of Style?

The Chicago Manual of Style, or CMS as it is affectionately referred to by editing professionals, is a style guide for publishers, editors and writers. Most school teachers and college professors have a list of things they want to see on students’ submissions. In the same way, publishing houses have a style they want to see submitted manuscripts follow. The CMS tells you how to:

• prepare manuscripts for publishing
• edit for publications
• cite sources

In addition, you can learn about copyright and about how books are developed and distributed. The guide also has a chapter on grammar and usage.

The CMS is updated every ten years or so, and is now in its fifteenth edition, which means that another update is due in approx. 2013. It is a huge hardback tome which could easily take over your desk. It’s up to you as to whether you prefer to follow it in book format or CD format.

I priced the book in my local book store at $55. Naturally, it is much cheaper on Amazon ($34.65 with free shipping). If you prefer to use it online, you have the advantage of seeing updates as they are made rather than waiting until the next edition is published. The price of an online subscription is $30 per year. It’s also available to small groups for a discounted subscription rate.

All manuscript editors have this book in one of its available formats. They would not be able to do their job properly if they didn’t. They also have (depending on the type of writing they edit) The Associated Press Stylebook (for articles), Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (for books), Webster’s New World College Dictionary (for articles), and The Christian Writer’s Manual of Style (for Christian publishers).

Do you really need to buy this if you are a writer? It depends. If you are a prolific writer of books, then adapting all writing to the CMS style would definitely make your submissions appear more professional. If you write one novel a year, your local library should have one or two copies of the manual. You can’t check one out, but you can do the final edit of your manuscript in the library, going over certain words and grammar you are not 100 percent sure of, and making corrections as needed. Doing so will be well worth the effort.

“Authors have to go that extra mile in polishing their manuscripts.”
~ Peter Rubie, CEO FinePrint Literary Management

 

 

Every piece of writing needs to be clear and precise. With microscope in hand, Inksnatcher’s writing and editing service will hone any work until it glitters in the light of a 1,000 watt bulb.

sallylogo3 INKSNATCHER.COM                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

 

But God Wrote This Book!! May 12, 2009

Bookmark and Share

A group of freelance editors got together last week to discuss the phenomenon of receiving submissions from authors who were sure their manuscripts came directly from God. Some statements made by writers:

God wrote my book.
I want to put God as the author on my front cover.
I’m just letting the Holy Spirit write it all.
I’m not sure how many words it will end up being. God is writing the book, and when he says it’s done, then it’s done.
God dictated this book to me; it has to be published.
On his title page, “By —–, as revealed by the Holy Spirit.”
I’m rewriting the Bible–God has told me that all the other translations are wrong and heresy, so I’m going to do it the right way.
You shouldn’t charge me for editing because it will be a service to God.
I know my book is going to be a best seller because the Holy Spirit is writing it.
God gave me this message.

The problem with this?
As with any piece of writing, a first draft will always be a first draft. Even if the words are moonbeamed from heaven, the writer will translate them into his or her own level of understanding, culture, and word choice; in other words, they won’t end up sounding exactly like God. Think of it in relation to playing telephone, only with one person in the chain whispering from the other side of a chasm.

Granted, there any many wonderful Christians who can hear the voice of the Holy Spirit and be led by him. Nevertheless, God requires excellence in his temples, and it takes the Ephesians’ “brick upon brick” (see Eph. 2:20-22) method to build something beautiful and complete. We are expected to be good stewards of any gift we have, so fair dues should be given to those writers who listened, wrote, and then dared to take the next step and submit their writing to an editor, agent, or publishing house. Being a good steward, though, also includes making the presentation of that gift as outstanding as possible.

Every master craftsman has gone through years of dedicated work to earn that title. In the same way, a writer is not naturally brilliant the moment he/she starts to write. Most established writers have worked with other writers, taken classes, and written a lot before their work was published. They honed the discipline of writing on a regular basis, of learning from critique, and of figuring out how to write clearly and in an orderly way that makes sense to the reader. Successful writers take their emotions out of the editing process and let the editor do his/her job to make the manuscript worthy of publication.

God can certainly guide an author along the way, using his/her talent and his voice to create something unique and beautiful. Nevertheless, when writers use some of the phrases mentioned in the opening of this article, the statements tend to creep out editors so much that they run the other way rather than sign up for the job.

“There’s an inside joke among editors that God is the worst literary agent ever.”

It happens, quite often, that when writers talk about being instantly successful because God gave them their Magnus Opus, it translates into meaning, “God gave me the words; therefore, I will make millions, and I don’t have to do any other work to make it excellent (because it already is).” With this mind-set and lack of effort on the writer’s part, an editor usually has to do a line-by-line edit because the quality of writing, grammar and punctuation is so bad.

Any agent would be hard pressed to think of a submission that did not need editing, despite the author’s fame to date. There will always be wordiness, misspelled words, and lack of clarity on some pages of a manuscript. Writing has never been a free fall into fame and fortune. Rewrites are the norm.

“If God wrote your book, why didn’t he edit it too?”

The cost of editing
A freelance editor owns her time, and she wants to use it well. She works to pay her bills and provide for her family. She cannot give accurate quotes based on unfinished work on the client’s behalf, nor can she rely on random word counts pulled out of the air.

Editing is a business.

Editors quote estimated charges based on the market prices and their years of experience, so if an editor has given you a quote, don’t ask for a reduced fee.

The Israelites were not a bunch of freeloaders asking for favors based on who they knew (God). They appreciated beauty and experience, and they were willing to pay good money for those things.

Consider this
Yes, God may be closer to you than your cochlea, but don’t assume that this means you have talent. Be humble, get input from practiced writers, and never submit anything to the bigwigs that is not 100% professional in appearance and quality. If an editor says your writing needs a lot of polishing, don’t take that comment as a criticism of your ability to hear God; just understand that you have not yet reached the level of master craftsman. Consider yourself an apprentice, learn from the best, and listen well. It was this approach that resulted in Joseph, Daniel, and David’s promotion in Old Testament times. Perhaps, by imitating the attitude of these tried and true heroes of the faith, your name will become famous, too.

Many thanks to the members of The Christian PEN: Proofreaders and Editors Network for their input on this topic.

 

The Rules of Grammar April 25, 2009

Filed under: Editing,Writing — sallyhanan @ 8:23 pm
Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

For a refresher course or lessons on the rules of English writing and grammar, this site can help:  http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/index.htm
It is probably the most comprehensive site on grammar and composition I have seen to date. Covering words, sentences, paragraphs, essays, and research papers; the site also has many interactive quizzes, teaches on peripherals, and hosts a forum called Ask Grammar.

 

Ellipses . . . April 7, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Ellipses are those dots that people put in their writing. . . .

Mirriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines an ellipsis as a mark showing an omission (as of words) or a pause. The singular form can be either written as ellipse or ellipsis; the plural is ellipses.

While I would love to write a long and intelligent article about ellipses, there are times when others seem to do such an excellent job (writing on the same subject) that it makes more sense to link to their input rather than write almost exactly the same thing myself. The Grammar Girl is one such writer, and here is her take on ellipses.

The Guide to Grammar and Writing suggests putting brackets around the ellipses in sentences.

Simple_icon_ellipsis

A teacher from UsingEnglish.com talks about putting a space . . . between each dot of the ellipses, rather than have them all squished together like the seven dwarfs in one bed (my simile). His statement is backed up by both the CMS and the MLA.

All I will say about ellipses . . . is that I like using them when I want to make a reader slow down . . . and think about what I’ve written. . . .

 

 

Every piece of writing needs to be clear and precise. With microscope in hand, Inksnatcher’s writing and editing service will hone any work until it glitters in the light of a 1,000 watt bulb.

sallylogo3 INKSNATCHER.COM                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

 

Grammar and Writing Help March 11, 2009

Bookmark and Share

I’ve discovered a huge asset to the writing community–http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/GRAMMAR/index.htm This site provides a huge ensemble of grammar and writing lessons, in addition to interactive quizzes and helpful tips for grammar phobes.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: